Please check the errata for any errors or issues Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1 W3C Recommendation 05 June 2018 This version: Latest published version: Latest editor's draft: Implementation report: Previous version: Previous Recommendation: Editors: Andrew Kirkpatrick (Adobe) Joshue O Connor (Invited Expert, InterAccess) Alastair Campbell (Nomensa) Michael Cooper ( W3C) WCAG 2.0 Editors (until December 2008): Ben Caldwell (Trace R&D Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison) Loretta Guarino Reid (Google, Inc. This document is also available in non-normative formats, available from Alternate Versions of Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.1. Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1 covers a wide range of recommendations for making Web content more accessible. Following these guidelines will make content more accessible to a wider range of people with disabilities, including accommodations for blindness and low vision, deafness and hearing loss, limited movement, speech disabilities, photosensitivity, and combinations of these, and some accommodation for learning disabilities and cognitive limitations but will not address every user need for people with these disabilities. These guidelines address accessibility of web content on desktops, laptops, tablets, and mobile devices. Following these guidelines will also often make Web content more usable to users in general. WCAG 2.1 success criteria are written as testable statements that are not technology-specific. Guidance about satisfying the success criteria in specific technologies, as well as general information about interpreting the success criteria, is provided in separate documents. See Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) Overview for an introduction and links to WCAG technical and educational material. WCAG 2.1 extends Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0, which was published as a W3C Recommendation December 2008. Content that conforms to WCAG 2.1 also conforms to WCAG 2.0. The WG intends that for policies requiring conformance to WCAG 2.0, WCAG 2.1 can provide an alternate means of conformance. The publication of WCAG 2.1 does not deprecate or supersede WCAG 2.0. ![]() While WCAG 2.0 remains a W3C Recommendation, the W3C advises the use of WCAG 2.1 to maximize future applicability of accessibility efforts. The W3C also encourages use of the most current version of WCAG when developing or updating Web accessibility policies. This section describes the status of this document at the time of its publication. Other documents may supersede this document. A list of current W3C publications and the latest revision of this technical report can be found in the W3C technical reports index at. This is a Recommendation of WCAG 2.1 by the Accessibility Guidelines Working Group. This document has been reviewed by W3C Members, by software developers, and by other W3C groups and interested parties, and is endorsed by the Director as a W3C Recommendation. It is a stable document and may be used as reference material or cited from another document. W3C's role in making the Recommendation is to draw attention to the specification and to promote its widespread deployment. This enhances the functionality and interoperability of the Web.īy publishing this Recommendation, W3C expects the functionality specified in this Recommendation will not be affected by changes to CSS Values and Units Module Level 3 or by Pointer Events Level 2. The Working Group will continue to track these specifications. To comment, file an issue in the W3C WCAG GitHub repository. ![]() The Working Group requests that public comments be filed as new issues, one issue per discrete comment. It is free to create a GitHub account to file issues. Vous pouvez également trouver toutes les solutions et réponses au bonus. ![]() Vous trouverez toutes les réponses classées par date et par mois ou par le nom thématique du mois. If filing issues in GitHub is not feasible, send email to ( comment archive). Vous trouverez ici toutes les solutions aux énigmes journalieres du jeu 4 images 1 mot. Comments received on the WCAG 2.1 Recommendation cannot result in changes to this version of the guidelines, but may be addressed in errata or future versions of WCAG. doi:10.1097/OGX.The Working Group does not plan to make formal responses to comments. Odeh M, Granin V, Kais M, Ophir E, Bornstein J. The ultrasound identification of fetal gender at the gestational age of 11–12 weeks. Placental imaging: normal appearance with review of pathologic findings. Ultrasound imaging.įadl S, Moshiri M, Fligner CL, Katz DS, Dighe M. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Practice guidelines for performance of the routine mid-trimester fetal ultrasound scan. Salomon LJ, Alfirevic Z, Berghella V, Bilardo C, Hernandez-Andrade E, Johnsen SL. A pictorial guide for the second trimester ultrasound. Bethune M, Alibrahim E, Davies B, Yong E.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |